The guilty verdict in the trial of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) had barely been delivered this afternoon when a few GOP senatorial heavyweights started using words like “disgrace,” and “consequences.” It was a far cry from four months ago, just before he was indicted, when a long list of GOP senators were listed on an invitation for a luncheon in his honor.
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was on that list. Today, instead of toasting Stevens, he had this to say:
“This is a sad but serious day. Sen. Stevens was found guilty by a jury of his peers, and now must face the consequences of those actions. As a result of his conviction, Sen. Stevens will be held accountable so the public trust can be restored.”
So was Sen. John Ensign (R-NV). Today Ensign said:
“This is a sad day for the United States Senate. Ted Stevens served his constituents for over 40 years and I am disappointed to see his career end in disgrace.”
Only fellow Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, who also was listed on the June invitation, stood by her man:
“Ted has asked for Alaskans and his Senate colleagues to stand with him as he pursues his legal rights. He stood with Alaskans for 40 years, and I plan to continue to stand with him.”
Does that mean she would still party for him?
Beneficiary: congressional candidate, lawmaker, or entity which collects funds raised at party
Host: person who is hosting party-often, but not always, a registered federal lobbyist
Venue Name: where the party is
Entertainment Type: type of gathering, such as "breakfast," "ski trip," "bowling"
Other Lawmakers Mentioned: lawmakers mentioned on invitation who are used as a draw for the event
Dana R. said...
The invitation to the luncheon honoring Ted Stevens carries the following: “Paid for and authorized by The Stevens for Senate Committee” and “1000 requested”. Sort of says it all. What has honoring come to mean in Washington?
Comment posted: Oct 31, 2008 at 2:20 pmLeave a Comment